-
About
Our Story
back- Our Mission
- Our Leadership
- Accessibility
- Careers
- Diversity, Equity, Inclusion
- Learning Science
- Sustainability
Our Solutions
back
-
Community
Community
back- Newsroom
- Discussions
- Webinars on Demand
- Digital Community
- The Institute at Macmillan Learning
- English Community
- Psychology Community
- History Community
- Communication Community
- College Success Community
- Economics Community
- Institutional Solutions Community
- Nutrition Community
- Lab Solutions Community
- STEM Community
- Newsroom
- Macmillan Community
- :
- English Community
- :
- Bits Blog
- :
- Casting a Wider Research Net: Checking for Variety
Casting a Wider Research Net: Checking for Variety
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark as New
- Mark as Read
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
- Report Inappropriate Content
Last week, I shared an activity encouraging students to move beyond using a Google search to find research. This week’s activity asks students to check the resources they have found for variety.
As was the case last week, Alison J. Head and Michael B. Eisenberg’s 2010 article “How Handouts for Research Assignments Guide Today’s College Students” inspired the activity. Head and Eisenberg found that students typically searched only for the kinds of sources required by the assignment. For instance, if the assignment asks students to find two books and an online source, students find only those items.
Instead of prescribing sources for students’ work, this week’s activity asks students to look for variety in their sources and provide brief annotations that explain how they will use the sources.
In the activity as shown below, I removed some information that is relevant only to the students in my classes. The five kinds of research sources came from the course textbook, Markel and Selber’s Technical Communication (12th edition). You can easily customize the activity for your class by using the list of resources from your course textbook. Any textbook that covers writing research projects will include a similar list.
Checking for Variety in Research Sources
Review the information in the section on “Types of Secondary Research Sources” (pp. 123) in Markel and Selber’s Technical Communication. The section discusses the following five kinds of sources:
- Books (including ebooks)
- Periodicals: Journals and Magazines
- Newspapers and online news sources
- Government documents
- Websites and social media
Checking for Variety
- For each type of research sources above, list the sources you have found so far that fall in the category, using the example to guide your answers. Include the following information for each source:
- Bibliographic citation, using whatever format is appropriate for your field (e.g., Electrical engineers use IEEE).
- A one-sentence (or fragment) summary of the information included in the source.
- Details on how you plan to use the source in your project.
- Once you list all of the sources that you have found, evaluate whether your sources show variety, using the following questions:
- How many different kinds of sources you have found? If a type of secondary research source is not appropriate for your project, explain why.
- How varied are the sources in each category? Consider the author(s), publisher, publication date, and other relevant factors.
- Review your audience analysis for the project, and state the kinds of research sources your readers will expect in your document. Explain how your sources meet the audience’s expectations.
- Explain whether the research sources you found show variety, using specific details.
- If your sources do not demonstrate variety, set additional research goals to find more secondary sources. Specifically state the additional kinds of sources you will look for in a paragraph or list.
- Review your answer to make sure it uses business-appropriate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Students are still working on this activity, so I don’t have results to share. I hope students will develop a habit of examining their research for variety. By having them include annotations that indicate how they will use the sources, students should move beyond variety simply for the sake of variety. Their choices have to be useful to their projects. I’m looking forward to reading their responses.
I would love to hear your responses to the activity too. Please leave me a comment below telling me your thoughts or sharing strategies that you use when teaching research projects.
Photo credit: A place to study. by San José Public Library on Flickr, used under a CC BY-SA 2.0 license.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.